Deep Work, Smartphones, and Changing Times

 How to Take Back the Control We Have Almost Lost

Deep work is the practice of limiting distractions and diving into a project or work-related activity with all efforts pointed towards that certain project (Newport, 2016). In society today, people are having difficulty concentrating on anything for longer than a few minutes due to our smartphone usage. The Technological Age has drastically changed our working models, and in turn, people are accomplishing less in the normal workday. 

Cal Newport dives into the practice of deep work and how the attention resistance could be the best step forward for people who are tired of being distracted all the time. The time has come for people to try to keep up with machines. “As intelligent machines improve, and the gap between machine and human abilities shrinks, employers are becoming increasingly likely to hire “new machines” instead of “new people,” (Newport, 23). Due to an unprecedented growth in the economy and technological world, restructuring is occurring. With this restructuring comes a divide among people in the “Intelligent Machine Age” – the high-skilled workers, the superstars and the owners (Newport, 2016). 

Siri, Where Am I?

New York City is one of my favorite places in the world. I love the feeling you get when you look up at the sky and see a jumble of skyscrapers around you. I love the hustle and the madness of the city by day and night.

You can find yourself on the crowded sidewalks of Times Square or in the quieter villages of the Upper West Side. Having been to the city countless times, I feel as though I have good grasp on where things are and where I am while walking around, but I can also feel turned around a lot, too.

When I walk up the steep steps at a subway stop, I look up and sometimes know exactly where I am. Other times, I look around and can’t tell which was is north or south.

Without my iPhone, navigating a city like New York would be difficult. Google maps has helped me in so many situations – in times where I am driving to a place I’ve never been to or just looking for a place to eat. We rely on our phones for a lot of things, but knowing where we are and where we want to go are some of the most important.

Not only do we rely on the phone itself, but more importantly, we rely on the apps that make up the phone, as described by Adam Greenfield in “Sociology of the Smartphone.”

“The smartphone is not particularly useful. It can be used to make voice calls, certainly; it generally comes loaded with a clock, calendar, weather and map applications, a Web browser, and a stock ticker. But the overwhelming balance of its functionality must be downloaded from the network in the form of apps” (Greenfield, 10).

Before reading Greenfield’s explanation of this idea, I had never thought of the iPhone as just a hosting device. But, without the apps, there wouldn’t be as much of a specialized use to the iPhone. I do believe, however, one of the most exciting parts of the iPhone is the camera. It has evolved tremendously over the years, and it is one of the best parts of the phone.

The evolution of not only the camera, but the entire phone is a fascinating timeline to examine. The first iPhone was unveiled in 2007 (Greenfield, 8), and I was in the fifth grade. I distinctly remember the news of the new gadget coming out – it was so futuristic. The size, the small circles known as applications, the invisible keyboard, the touch screen.

The fact that you could touch the screen and things would move was so new and exciting. Everyone wanted one, but they were really expensive at the time. I remember not really knowing anyone my age who owned one. It was more for adults who used it for work.

The first iPhone I owned came in my junior year of high school – five years later. My friends, classmates and I went through the flip phone era before any of us had iPhones, which I am thankful for.


Has this accelerated transition of technology been for the better or for the worse? Greenfield examines this question with the idea that there probably isn’t a correct answer. I’ve found that we as humans are trained to always strive to be better and do better. We have the idea that working hard and creating news ideas is just how we function.

Is there a more efficient way to do this and to make things easier for people? How can we improve this product? How can we make our business better?

Tech companies everywhere try to answer these questions, and in turn, we arrive at where we are today, with iPhones attached to us like we are handcuffed to them.  

Dear So-and-So, Sorry for the Late Email

Now more than ever, people receive work-related alerts throughout the day and into the late hours of the night. The dam of life is open and email inboxes are flooding.

Employees are pressured into returning emails almost immediately after receiving them, including myself. (Texting has really become the new email, but we will save that for another discussion). Work efficiency is down and unread mail is up. Are companies looking to fix this?

Well, according to Clive Thompson, Adam Gazzaley and Larry Rosen, some companies are trying to help their employees out. Edelman, a public relations firm in Toronto, uses a 7-to-7 rule, where employees are encouraged to only respond or send emails during the hours of 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. (Thompson, 2014).

I thought this was a great strategy to use, but unfortunately, some companies and employees can’t always act on that rule. Time sensitive issues can arise, and a response at a late hour is occasionally required. However, I believe companies can take the time to implement some form of this rule.

In Cal Newport’s Deep Work, he emphasizes the fact that people would rather respond quickly to an email than take the time to have a meeting or talk on the phone.

“We find ourselves in distracting open offices where inboxes cannot be neglected and meetings are incessant – a setting where colleagues would rather you respond quickly to their latest e-mail than produce the best possible results” (Newport, 97).

I find this to be very true in a typical office setting. I rarely have meetings anymore, but I find that meetings are really helpful. In addition to actually sitting and talking to people that you work with, getting up and physically moving to a different space and not looking at a computer is always a good thing.

I am all for meetings, but people nowadays would rather just send you a quick email than get up and communicate out loud.

It turns out, the idea of being more efficient with fast responses on our smartphones actually makes us less efficient. It will be interesting to see what a typical office is like in five to ten years.

References

Gazzaley, A. Rosen, L. (2018, Jan. 8) Remedies for the distracted mind. Retrived from https://behavioralscientist.org/remedies-distracted-mind/

Greenfield, A. (2017). Sociology of a smartphone. Retrieved from https://longreads.com/2017/06/13/a-sociology-of-the-smartphone/

Newport, C. (2016). Deep Work. London: Grand Central Publishing.

Thompson, C. (2014, Aug. 28). End the tyranny of 24/7 email. Retrived from https://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/29/opinion/end-the-tyranny-of-24-7-email.html

Wake up Call – Sent from My iPhone

Have the Negatives of Social Media Overtaken the Benefits?

Throughout our childhoods, we flip the through pages of countless books. Books required for school reading and books for reading in a beach chair; books we love and can’t put down and books we hate and fall asleep reading at the kitchen table on a late school night.

I quickly discovered as a kid that people either love reading or hate it. There’s no middle ground. You were either the person waiting in line at a Barnes and Noble when the new Harry Potter book came out, or you weren’t.

I was the one waiting in line for The Deathly Hallows.

Growing up, I was surprised to always hear the same reaction from people about loving to read. People thought it was the worst possible way to spend free time.

“Oh, you actually like to read?”

But, more recently, I have discovered that even the avid readers have replaced those best-sellers with iPhone screens. We now live in a world where we digest information by scrolling endlessly through small blocks of 240 characters or less. We read opinions from thousands of people every day, some of whom we have never met.

Even authors, who write for a living, claim to be losing their reading endurance. Michael Harris, the author of Solitude: A Singular Life in a Crowded World, believes the “screen-orientated style of reading” has detrimentally impacted our old style of reading skillset.

“…Book-oriented styles of reading opened the world to me – by closing it. And new, screen-oriented styles of reading seem to have the opposite effect: They close the world to me, by opening it (Harris, 2018, p. 2).”

Books give our imaginations a new door into new worlds we never thought possible, all through the use of language. They take us to places where no one else can be, and in a way that opens the rest of the world to us after we put the words down.

Screens have a way of closing people off from the world, by giving them an entire world of information. With the stroke of a few keys, we can find the answer to any question instantly. By having the answers at our fingertips, our attention span is completely diminished. We no longer have to make our brain work. In turn, we have lost the ability to read well.

Interestingly, we aren’t reading less. It’s more so that we are reading worse.

“In a very real way, to lose old styles of reading to lose a part of ourselves (Harris, 2018, p. 3).”

Now the Millennials ask, or at least some of us do, have the negative effects of screens and instantaneous response officially outweighed the benefits? Will our children’s children ever hold a real book in their hands?

Generation Z’ers, whose first word was “iPhone,” do not see their lives as something related to the addiction to technology. “Generation Z addresses new technology as an “extension of themselves” rather than an addiction or compulsion,” (Vigo, 2019, p. 1).

Is it too late to turn back now?

DEEP READING -> DEEP WORK

One of the best skills we learn in school is reading comprehension. We learned to sit down, take notes and remember what we are reading. We had discussions and watched films about the books we studied.

This practice was especially difficult when you hated the book you were assigned to read. There were always books in high school that just did not appeal to certain students. We all remember the books we enjoyed and the books we hated.

1984.

That was the book. The book that I despised. I can still remember the smell of the overused paperback – old, grimy and depressingly gray, just like the plot.

I read it my freshman year and always thought it was introduced too early. I understood the overwhelming theme of “Big Brother” and how this was a prediction for what our world was going to turn in to (you weren’t too far off there, Mr. Orwell), but it was a complex plot to digest as a young freshman.

Despite wanting to throw 1984 behind me and move on to whatever Shakespeare play we were going to read next, I still remember it and I remember how it made me feel – anxious, depressed, confused. But, the deep reading/work that went into that project showed that even with books you don’t love, you can still understand them and retain the information if you work hard and understand deep work.

Deep Work by Cal Newport

“As intelligent machines improve, and the gap between machine and human abilities shrinks, employers are becoming increasingly likely to hire “new machines” instead of “new people,” (Newport, 2016, p. 23).

That’s a bit daunting, isn’t it?

Due to an unprecedented growth in the economy and technological world, restructuring is occurring. With this restructuring comes a divide among people in the “Intelligent Machine Age” – the high-skilled workers, the superstars and the owners.

The high-skilled workers work well with machines, the superstars are the top-notch group people that excel at what they do and the owners have the direct access to capital.

Newport gives us a few tips to help us survive in the ever-changing technological environment that we find ourselves in every day.  

We must quickly master hard things while producing on an elite level with quality and speed.

Simple enough, right?

As a professional in the communication world, I have noticed that if you find yourself behind on “the next big thing” it is hard to catch up. The digital world changes every day, and in turn, you must also change and evolve every day.

One of the best tools you can use to stay current is YouTube. You have to be able to teach yourself as the world evolves around you, otherwise it will leave you behind…

______________

References: Cal Newport’s Deep Work; Michael Harris’ “I Have Forgotten How to Read”; Julian Vigo’s Forbes article “Generation Z and New Technology’s Effect on Culture”